Measurements and Feedback
What are we evaluating?
Regular assessments are conducted to improve education, training, student services, and institutional operations. The most important sources of information are student feedback, faculty and staff evaluations, educational effectiveness indicators, graduate career tracking, and the experiences of external partners.
Student Evaluation of Faculty Work (OMHV)
The OMHV is an anonymous and voluntary student evaluation that assesses the clarity and coherence of instruction, the appropriateness of learning requirements and assessment, the practical usefulness of the knowledge acquired, and the extent to which student feedback is taken into account.
The results are professionally evaluated, and a person in charge, a deadline, and a follow-up criterion are assigned for any necessary improvements. Students are informed about the main trends in the institution-wide, aggregated results and the related measures. We do not publish individual instructor results or personal data.
Additional Evaluations
- General student satisfaction survey—experiences with the curriculum, learning environment, and student services.
- Faculty, administrative, and staff evaluations—an overview of professional performance, competencies, and development needs.
- Feedback from partners and employers—an assessment of the practical applicability and relevance of the programs.
- Graduate Career Tracking System (DPR) and alumni feedback—analysis of graduates’ academic and labor market experiences.
- Application and admission statistics; program effectiveness, dropout rates, and student progress; organizational self-assessments.
What do we do with the feedback?
We use the results of these assessments to inform professional and managerial decisions. The implementation and effectiveness of measures resulting from these evaluations are tracked in MIR’s central records. We present the aggregated results available to the public and the key improvements resulting from them on the “Results and Improvements” page. MIR’s measurement system enables fact- and data-driven decision-making.
How does the feedback process conclude?
After reviewing the measurement results, if an indicator shows a deviation or a need for improvement arises, an action plan or corrective action is documented. An action is considered closed only after its implementation, once a follow-up measurement has been conducted based on the established effectiveness criteria.